Author: madychase04

Free Inquiry ~ Summary of our Journey

Summary 

Photo by Markus Winkler on Unsplash 

 

Our Free Inquiry project has been driven by our shared desire to find technological resources to support differentiated learning for our future students. We are all aspiring teachers and recognize the need for more support in schools and the expanding demands for modified instructional styles to fit the needs of the students. In our personal and professional experiences, we have noticed the academic world needs to adapt to the increasingly diverse student body, including recognition and resources for students with disabilities, new students in Canada, mental health challenges, and socioeconomic differences. Residual factors from COVID, such as lockdown, trauma experiences, and the mismatch between grade level and skill levels are all contributing factors to the growing epidemic of students struggling to perform at their expected grade level. 

 

The four technologies we researched aligned well with open and distributed learning principles. Some of the resources found were entirely new to us like, Open Educational Resource Commons (OER Commons) and Augmented and Alternative Apps such as Proloquo and TouchChat, while others were more familiar, like Khan Academy and Speech-to-Text. 

 

In this video, the teacher, Samantha Kirch, explains how she integrates technology into her classroom by using a Smartboard and iPads for the students. She also outlines how a similar engagement style can be utilized with whiteboards. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4odUJ73_wo 

 

So where does this project leave us? What now? Since exploring these resources, we all have a better grasp on ways to integrate differentiated instructional styles into our teaching, but the next move is to try them out with students and find the best supports and resources for differing ages, abilities, languages, and personalities. We know every student is unique and has individual needs and finding the best fit for each student will support their probability of success in their studies and in life. 

 

All of the technologies that we have explored throughout this free inquiry project are ones that we think would be great resources for educators looking to expand their competencies in relation to open and distributed learning. Overall, this project was an interesting and educational research opportunity that allowed us to explore resources that will benefit not only ourselves but also our future students, as was our learning goal from the beginning: To discover the best resources to support our learners through the use of differentiated technology with a focus on open and distributed learning. We hope you have also found some of the resources interesting and will get to try them for yourselves or in your future classrooms. 

 

Thank you for joining us (Anna Plamer, Mady Chase, Hanne Deener, Nicole Bell) on this educational inquiry journey.

Post #5 ~ Speech-to-Text

Speech-to-Text 

Young entrepreneur reading an e-mail on computer while recording voice message on smart phone during late night work in the office.

Image Published on August 25th, 2022 Licensed under Unsplashed+ Getty Images  

Intro:

Last week, we examined Khan Academy’s availability and limitations. We found that it follows the principles of open and distributed learning. This week, we decided to take a look at Speech-to-text technology. As a reminder, our learning goal is to discover the best resources to support our learners through the use of differentiated technology. So let’s delve in! 

What is Speech-to-Text?

Speech-to-text, also known as voice-to-text, is a technology that changes spoken words into written text. This technology uses Artificial Intelligence to transcribe, dictate, assist, and navigate. It can transcribe audio from recordings, interviews, lectures, etc. This technology is also used in voice-controlled navigation systems. However, we will focus on dictation to keep this topic relevant to K-8 classrooms. Dictation is the process of taking speech and turning it into written text. This could be in a document, email, search engine, etc. Students with disabilities commonly use speech-to-text technology.

Availability

Speech-to-text technologies are widely available and are becoming easier to use. For example, Windows has a built-in voice typing tool that pops up when you click the Windows key + H. Microsoft Word and Google Docs also have free built-in voice tools. This means students can write papers or assignments by speaking rather than typing. Schools support this technology and tend to include it in students’ IEPs. There are many free versions. However, some are paid programs. Paid programs are designed for people with more advanced needs and offer more accuracy and complex tools.

Limitations

Although this technology is widely accessible, it has many limitations. Accuracy issues like misrecognition of words, messing up homophones (there, their, and they’re), and no punctuation (unless specified) are common. Users also need access to technology such as a device, wifi, and a microphone, without which they are left unsupported. Due to various factors, some students don’t have this kind of technological access. There is also the concern for the environment.  The classroom may be too loud with background noise, or an individual might feel awkward or shy to speak out loud. Language and accents also play a role, as this technology sometimes can’t understand what the speaker is saying. Lastly, the paid programs can cost a lot of money, and many students can’t access them without financial aid.

Relation to Open and Distributed Learning 

Speech-to-text technology fits into the principles of open and distributed learning. Openness refers to the practice of removing barriers to education to make it accessible to everyone. Speech-to-text fits this principle as it is free, can be used on various devices, can be used on open educational resources (Google Docs, discussion forums, etc), and allows for greater equity in participation. Distributed learning is education that occurs over various times and locations, often referring to online learning. Speech-to-text fits this well as it can be used at home, in class, on the go, and on various devices. This technology also allows students to work independently at their own pace, which is ideal for asynchronous courses. Overall, this tool supports open and d

Personal Experiences with Speech-to-Text – Mady Chase

I have extensive experience with speech-to-text. This tool is extremely helpful to me as someone with dyslexia. I have used it in professional and casual settings. I’ve used it to write papers, reflections, emails, texts, lectures, etc. Spelling is one of my biggest challenges, to the point where auto-correct and Grammarly don’t always know what I’m trying to write. However, speaking the words helps the word processor understand what I’m trying to spell. I also tend to waste time trying to spell a word, so speech-to-text speeds up the process. Although it works great and is easily accessible, I have to edit it and speak slower than normal so it picks up what I’m saying. I also need to speak the punctuation parts, which can sound funny and mess up the flow of my speech. Overall, I love this tool and its openness to those who can benefit from it.

Post #4 ~ Khan Academy

Khan Academy

https://www.khanacademy.org/

Khan Academy Kids

Image from Clever Library, illustrating Khan Academy

What is it?

We chose to dive deeper into one of the open online resources. Khan Academy is a nonprofit, American based educational organization. This platform shares a range of useful content, lessons and practice exercises on a variety of schooling subjects. Students can use this website to find instructional videos and articles along with interactive practices on math, science, arts, humanities and more. This technology gives students an engaging opportunity for additional or alternative teachings on everyday class content. 

Availability

Khan Academy is widely available and free to sign up. This is a resource that is used by millions of people all around the world and is available through their online website as well as their mobile app. The Khan Academy is a resource that provides multiple language lesson translations (Spanish, French, Brazilian and Portuguese).

Limitations

Although Khan Academy is used worldwide and benefits many individuals, just like any other technology there are limitations. Khan Academy is an online source that lacks interaction and collaboration with others. Its focus is on independent study/ learning through video. The auditory/ visual teaching style can also limit a student’s engagement with the content as it’s not the best for that individual to learn. Another limitation that is embedded in Khan Academy’s practice is the strategy of memorization. Students are able to work through a course/ lessons and redo an activity until it is complete. The students ability to memorize the answers of an already completed activity cause their to be less actual content learning 

Relation to Open and Distributed Learning

The principles of open and distributed learning focus on accessibility and flexibility on diverse learning needs. Khan Academy aligns with these principles, this platform provides a free, open, educational resource that can be accessed by anyone, anywhere. This platform is designed for personalized learning experiences where students engage with the content at their own pace and place!

Experience with Khan Academy

Our experience with Khan Academy, as detailed by one member of our group, is the high regard for reliable and user-friendly access to school subject support with teachers who are excellent at explaining the concepts to learners and educators alike. I like this resource, recommend it to others, and will continue to use it. 

Post #3 ~Open Online/Educational Resources

Open Online/Educational Resources

TECHNOLOGY & PHOTOGRAPHY DRONES LAPTOPS HEADPHONES MOBILES HEADPHONES CAMERAS Desk Stock Photo

Photo by Marvin Meyer on Unsplash 

What is it?

Open Online/Educational Resources as a concept. Let’s talk about it! First, what are Open Online/Educational Resources, or OER? Continuing along with our learning and discovery journey of compiling multiple aspects for supporting our students with differentiated technology, we started looking at Open Online Resources, also known as Open Educational Resources, Open Pedagogy, or OERs, which are “teaching and learning resources created with the intention of being freely accessible to all” (Simon Fraser University, 2024). This means that members of the general public and private sectors all have open and free access to educational resources and materials as they wish.

OERs are available through internet connections (WiFi or Ethernet) on personal, professional, or other, devices such as computers, tablets, phones, or iPads. They are utilized often in educational settings like schools and post-secondary institutions, but can be offered in employment settings such as for training or upgrading purposes.

Availability

The availability for these resources is to be free and easy to access for users. As our group is comprised of aspiring middle school and elementary teachers, we wanted to focus on the resources we would be using in our classroom and suggesting to our students. That being said, these are still available for anyone’s use. Let’s take a closer look at some examples of OERs for elementary and middle school students specifically.

  • Khan Academy ~ a classic open educational resource, but for good reasons. Khan Academy is a free website dedicated towards supporting coursework in schools and can be an excellent resource for learning at home, especially with parents, guardians, or family members that can benefit from following along with the learner! What we like about Khan Academy is made by teachers and features teachers explaining concepts in bite-sized pieces with visual and audio recordings. More information can be found in the next blog post here.
  • Open Educational Resource Commons (OER Commons) ~ an educational hub for students from kindergarten to grade 12 that offers resources for course supplementation or full course. They have resource collections to use at home or in a class (online or in-person) that are organized by grade level, subject, and provider.
  • Bored Teachers ~ a collection of educational websites for elementary students specifically, but not exclusively, that targets learning (of course) and having fun while doing so!
  • We Are Teachers ~ hundreds of online learning resources that are available for teachers, students, or parents that cover elementary and middle-school subjects with some printable materials, online lessons, and game-type activities. There are many resources that help support differentiated learning styles and students with disabilities.

Limitations

The limitations to OERs are the requirement for access to internet and technology and the need to set up non-invasive accounts with a couple of the platforms, which requires an email. While the world steadily marches towards even more reliance on technology and automation, the technological divide tends to increase with growing socioeconomic inequalities which decreases the availability to education when more learning is conducted online.

Relation to Open and Distributed Learning

The relation of OERs and open and distributed learning is quite high with potential for a dependent relationship between the two. As Open and Distributed learning relies on having resources and materials that are available for distanced learners, OERs fulfill the Open aspect, the flexibility, and the availability for students to learn from their residence. The relationship between the two also offers enhanced student engagement and reduces the costs of an educational experience while offering access for students who may have life responsibilities that conflict with a traditional school schedule. OERs encourage educators to continue modifying and improving content which makes the materials more directed to the learner’s needs and goals. OERs, just like Open and Distributed Learning go hand-in-hand with prioritizing student-centered education and offer diverse methods of instruction.

Experiences with OERs

We have limited experiences with identified OERs as it is a recent discovery for us, but may have unknowingly used them in the past. We’re looking forward to integrating the technological resources into our own pedagogical approaches when we become teachers.

Post #2~Augmentative and Alternative Communication

Augmentative and Alternative Communication

Proloquo2 Go Callout

Image from Pitt-Hopkins Research Foundation illustrating Proloquo2Go, 45 Core Vocabulary 

In this free inquiry project, we are exploring technologies that support diverse learners in educational settings. Our learning goal is to discover the best resources to support our learners through the use of differentiated technology. Over the coming weeks, we will share our findings on several tools designed to make learning more accessible and inclusive!

What is it?

The first technology that we explored is Augmentative and Alternative Communication, or, AAC. AAC refers to a variety of methods and tools that support or replace spoken communication. AAC can be an incredibly useful resource for children and adults who have difficulty speaking or are non-verbal. It includes everything from simple picture boards and social stories to advanced apps like Proloquo and TouchChat, which are widely used in elementary schools.

These apps transform iPads into interactive communication devices. Users can tap symbols, words, or phrases, which the app then speaks aloud. Proloquo even includes a companion app called Proloquo Coach designed to help parents and educators facilitate the learning process. This technology allows users not just to select single words but also to build sentences by dragging and dropping icons, which encourages expressive language development.

Availability

AAC apps like Proloquo and TouchChat are available for download on iPads and other tablets. These tools are most commonly used in schools with students who have autism spectrum disorder (ASD), Down’s Syndrome, speech delays, hearing impairments, or other challenges affecting verbal communication. 

Limitations

While AAC technology is incredibly beneficial, there are some concerns about potential over-reliance. In one case I encountered, a former educational assistant shared her experience using TouchChat with a student who had Down Syndrome. While the app proved to be incredibly helpful, she noted that it led to the student becoming overly dependent on the technology, even though they were capable of speaking more on their own. The technology, in this sense, was almost too effective, and illustrates that, in some cases, students can become so comfortable using the app that they start to view it more as a toy or activity as opposed to a tool for communication. As a result, they may become reluctant to speak without it, even if they are ready and able to do so.

Relation to Open and Distributed Learning

AAC aligns extremely well with the principles of open and distributed learning by providing accessible, personalized communication tools that can be used anytime and anywhere. These apps can extend learning beyond traditional classroom boundaries, empowering students to express themselves independently and actively participate in their education. This approach aligns perfectly with our learning goal: to discover the best resources to support our learners through differentiated technology. AAC apps offer highly customizable experiences tailored to individual communication needs, making learning more inclusive and equitable.

Inquiry Project Plan

Learning/Project Plan

Photo by Nick Morrison on Unsplash

Group Project By: Anna Palmer, Mady Chase, Hanne Deener, Nicole Bell

 

Learning Goal: Our goal is to discover the best resources to support our learners through the use of differentiated technology with a focus on open and distributed learning.

 

In each post, we plan to include an overview of what each resource is and why it is useful or helpful to our future careers and experiences. We will be adding the relation to our learning goal and delve into the drawbacks or limitations, if any. There will also be a section about where the resources are utilized or available and our own experiences using the resources! 

 

Week 1:

  • Came up with the topic
  • Blog post #1 – Augmentative and alternative communication

Week 2:

  • Blog post #2 – Open Online Resources
  • Blog post #3 – Khan Academy

Week 3:

  • Blog post #4 – Text-to-speech 
  • Blog post #5 – Summary

 

Stay tuned for more updates on our learning/project plan journey!

Critical Reflection Week 3

Summery: 

This week’s reflection will be on the article “What’s next for Ed-Tech? Critical hopes and concerns for the 2020s, Learning, Media and Technology,” by Neil Selwyn et al. This article discusses the key challenges and concerns for educational technology in the coming decade of the 2020s. It argues that this is the time for EdTech scholars to critically assess and reshape technology education. Selwyn emphasizes the importance of addressing these challenges and the hope of reaching equity, sustainability, and human-centred design within EdTech.

Here are the six challenges the article mentions:

  1. New forms of digital in/exclusion
  2. Platform economics in an age of artificial intelligence 
  3. ‘Divisions of learning’ across humans and machines
  4. IT industry actors as a leading educational force
  5. Reimagining forms of EdTech suitable for an age of climate change.
  6. Finding alternatives: solidary economies, convivial technology, respectful design 

My Thinking:

Education and technology are constantly changing, growing, and developing. Although this sounds great, it doesn’t mean the educational or digital divide is decreasing; sometimes it means the opposite. This article pointed this out, explaining how there have always been exclusion issues, and quickly advancing EdTech means there will be even more.

I believe the article’s first section on New forms of digital inclusion is the most vital. As a privileged person, I grew up never having to think about how I was receiving my education, if at all, let alone if I would be at a disadvantage. When I needed a computer, we bought one with no concern about how we would afford it. Sadly, this is not the case for many people. Although I have been at an advantage my whole life economically, I understand struggles. I grew up in a military family, forcing me to grow fast and see reality. I also have dyslexia and anxiety, which have come with their challenges and obstacles. As an empathetic person who understands struggle, I have always wanted to help others. Becoming a teacher is the best way I could imagine to help people. This is why this topic of exclusion is so important to me. I couldn’t help but reflect on last week’s blog post about Andy Lane’s article “The Impact on Openness on Bridging the Educational Digital Divides.” It saddens me to think about the children worldwide who don’t have access to education or technology.

This past year, I completed my Link 2 Practice (Sept-Dec weekly observational visits to a classroom) and my first 3-week practicum in April-May. These two experiences were significantly different. My L2P was at Quadra Elementary, which is known for being a low-income school, while my practicum was at St. Michael’s University School Junior Campus. Reflecting on the EdTech within both schools is astonishing, considering they are only 6km away. Quadra had five tablets per classroom, an overhead projector, and a computer for the teacher. SMUS had designated Chromebooks for each student and teacher, a classroom printer, and a loft in every room (replacing whiteboards). They even have a virtual tour of the school on their website. Seeing firsthand the difference between the two schools showed me how significant the digital and educational gap is. The students at SMUS were better resourced, which gave them an advantage and allowed them to be more advanced in their academic ability.

This upsets me as the students at Quadra didn’t do anything to deserve less; they should be equals. As a future teacher, I strive to help all students and bridge the gap. How can I actively contribute to this?

Thanks for reading my blog!

Critical Reflection Week 2

Summary: 

For my first critical reflection, I read Andy Lane’s article “The Impact on Openness on Bridging the Educational Digital Divides.” This article discusses how the concept of openness in education has changed and could potentially increase the digital divide that society is already facing. In principle, openness enhances access to education by eliminating cost and prior achievement or qualification requirements. However, many learners face barriers when confronted with open education. This includes the lack of technological access, low digital literacy, cultural norms, and personal circumstances. This article argues that open education on its own is insufficient, and there needs to be added structure and support for it to decrease the digital divide. Lane suggests that support from intermediaries (teachers, community networks, etc) and the focus on cultural and social inclusion will help bridge the digital and educational divide.

Figure 1

(Image is from Lane’s article)

My Thoughts:

I found this article to be extremely interesting. When I first started reading about openness in higher education, I thought it was perfect. As I continued reading, I realized this could add to the growing digital divide. The article included a list of reasons someone may be excluded or have a barrier. This list was eye-opening for me. Before seeing this list, I couldn’t think of the many obstacles one might have regarding open education.

Here is the list:

  • Geographical remoteness, even in rural areas of small countries;
  • Cultural norms, with some ethnic cultures not supporting the education of women in particular circumstances, for instance (Khokhar, 2008);
  • Social norms, whereby some family groups or communities do not value education as highly as others, so discouraging engagement;
  • Prior achievements, such as prior qualifications being used as a filter related to accessing a scarce resource or to maintaining an individual institution’s social and cultural status;
  • Individual or household income, where the relative cost of accessing higher education by certain groups is very high;
  • Digital divide, in that although computers and the Web offer many freedoms, they still cost money to access, and people with less money may not easily afford such technology and may even find that the absolute cost to them is higher than to other groups because they are seen as a greater financial risk to a technology provider;
  • Physical circumstances, whereby there may not be any easy places to undertake the learning due to lack of a home, space in a home, or having a particular type of home, such as a prison, and similarly, people with certain disabilities may need specialist equipment or support (Cooper, Lowe, & Taylor, 2008);
  • Individual norms, where a person is constrained by social and cultural norms – attitudes and beliefs – that they are not capable or not good enough to study at this level, as may be the case with older people (Martin, 2009) 

 

After reading the list, I was able to identify why I couldn’t imagine these barriers before. I’m a pretty privileged person who has never had to experience these types of challenges. Thinking about my life, I felt an overwhelming sense of sadness that overcame me. As a future teacher, I strive to help learners and firmly believe everyone has the right to education. It is disheartening to hear that many people struggle even with free educational resources. I then couldn’t help but think about my current situation with education. This article speaks explicitly about higher education as an open concept. I’m currently in a higher education program and am enrolled in four summer courses. All four of these courses are fully online and include open resources (although I paid for the course, there were no extra expenses for readings, textbooks, etc.). As a privileged person, I didn’t even think twice about enrolling and completing these online, non-face-to-face, technology courses. Although I don’t consider my technology skills extending, they are proficient enough for me to have the confidence to complete these classes. That is a key element to bridging the digital divide.

As I think more about decreasing the digital and educational divide, I wonder how I can positively contribute. I want to ensure my students are well set up for success and feel confident in themselves. How can I do this in an elementary classroom?

Thank you for reading my blog! I hope I’ve sparked some thinking and would love to hear your thoughts on openness and how we can actively bridge the educational and digital divide.

© 2025 Open Learning

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑